Alfa Romeo Giulia Forum banner

Seletron Chipbox Review

30K views 48 replies 15 participants last post by  Callisto  
#1 ·
Alright, for reasons unknown to me, I decided I wanted to bump up the HP on my QV. There are a few companies that have put out ECM tunes for the QV now, but I wanted a less permanent, less expensive solution. I'm sure most of you have seen the thread by now, but I decided to go with the Seletron Chipbox. It's a piggyback system that hijacks the data from sensors under the hood, alters that data, and then lies to the ECUs to increase fuel and boost pressure (from my limited understanding). The Seletron site reports a total of 570 hp and 494 ft lbs of torque after install, and I paid about $850 for the two Chipboxes (one for each turbo). Install was simple- just had to remove the engine cover and airbox assembly, then disconnect a total of 8 wire harnesses to plug into the Chipbox connectors. A few zip ties here and there, put the airbox and engine cover back in, and done. There was one sensor, the passenger side fuel rail sensor, that was a @#$% to get to, but the rest were a piece of cake. All of the Chipbox connectors were high quality and fit perfectly, and the wires all were more than long enough and have protective covers around them. And when it comes time for service, I can uninstall the whole system in about half an hour.



I fired up the QV and took it for a gentle late night spin. Zero warning lights, woo hoo. Seletron says to drive normally with a few pulls here and there for the first 50 miles, then the full performance should be unlocked and ready to go. As an aside, when I installed the Chipboxes, I kind of wondered how much of a difference it would make, and if I'd be able to feel it enough to justify the expense. I live in a rural area with a lot of empty roads, and I take every opportunity to drive 'spiritedly'. As strange as it may sound, I had kind of gotten used to the speed. But when I put my foot down on those same backroads after the Chipboxes were installed, the same way I have countless times over the past 8 months, it honestly took me by surprise. Now I want to give a disclaimer here that my previous car was a 10 year old Mazda 3. My first time on a track was 2 days ago. I put a few mods on my Civic in high school and liked to pretend it was fast, but the QV is my first REAL car. I'm a pretty young guy, and I'm not experienced enough to say things like "It feels about 10% more powerful from 2-3k RPMs than it did before, but not as much from 3-5k, and the low end torque is greater, but etc etc etc" or compare it to some race car I used to track all the time in the '80s...



BUT I can say that it feels so much faster now. I'm sure it's not THAT much faster, but it sure feels like it. It pulls like crazy through the whole rev range, and slams me back into my seat even more than before. I went to pass someone on a two lane road the day after installing it, and when I downshifted and mashed the throttle, I got a ton of rear wheel spin. That was definitely new. On those empty country roads, I like to come to full stop and practice launches late at night every once in a while. Now when I rev it up to 2k rpm and then release the brake pedal and go go go, the rear end is all over the place. It was tough to keep the rear end from breaking loose when launching it before, but now it's darn near impossible. Over the past week, I've learned to drive a bit differently. Throttle response is improved, as is turbo lag. I don't have to give as much throttle input now, so I've been learning to keep my foot out of it a bit so I don't get arrested. That initial hesitation when accelerating from a dead stop is still there, but doesn't seem as pronounced. Oh and one member asked about the 'pops and bangs' or barks from the exhaust- I rolled my windows down and really paid attention to the exhaust sound, and the upshift barks are definitely louder. I wouldn't say there are more of them, or that they're easier to induce, but they're louder for sure. This is getting lengthy so one more thought/question- does anyone know if these piggyback systems affect shift points? I swear my QV is holding gears just a tad longer now. I'm almost always in dynamic mode, and I've noticed that when I expect an upshift, it waits just a hair longer. That may be my imagination, but I hadn't been expecting it to affect the shift points, so it caught my attention when the upshift I was expecting didn't happen on time.



So, in summary, two thumbs up from me. I don't have any 1/4 mile, 0-60, or dyno numbers to back any of this up, but this sucker is quick(er). Pulls pulls pulls. More rear wheel spin under heavy throttle, and tons of fun. If you want some more umph and don't mind forgoing the more advance high tech ECU tunes for the dumb Chipbox, I'd highly recommend it.
 
#2 ·
I didn't want to lengthen the original post even more, but I took my QV to the track on Monday. Holy @#$#, so much fun! I switched out my wheels to my Nitto NT05s and went to Pacific Raceways in Kent, WA for the Proformance HPDE course. After spending the morning in class and doing some evasive/braking maneuvers and slalom, we spent the afternoon lapping with an instructor in the passenger seat. This was my first time on a track, so I'm definitely a novice, but the QV was fantastic. Given my limited experience, I wasn't pushing her even close to her limits, but man what a rush. Running up to 130mph on the straightaway, then standing on the brakes into a turn, then rolling back onto the throttle, then the crazy G-forces around the turns, it was all awesome. I know some other members with much more driving ability and track experience have said the stock setup on the QVs isn't ideal for track use, but I had so much fun. I've never driven any car like that, that hard for that long, and she behaved just fine. No warning lights or limp mode, no overheating, tires (not stock admittedly) were great. Smelled like burning brakes afterwards, of course, but I checked on the pads and rotors and everything is A-OK. As long as you're sticking to 7/10 laps every once in awhile, I think she'll be just fine. I can't wait to get back out there and do it again soon.
 
#3 ·
I believe in the other post there is mention of a flash/chip for the transmission too, that may address the shift points. The revs may be climbing and getting to the limiter faster than they used to and the transmission may not be able to shift quick enough to keep up. Either way, to have no faults come up it seems like it works well.
 
#6 ·
@BGorilla - thank you for sharing your experience.I am a bit jealous that you get to drive "spiritedly" so often /forum/images/smilies/smile.gif Who did you get Chipboxes from? Have you had Nitto NT05s "heat cycled" before taking them to the track? Are you still on stock breaks?
I didn't want to put it in the original post and seem like I was advertising or anything, but I got the Chipboxes from a place called Driving Impressions in New Jersey. Their website is teamdi.com and the contact I worked with was Bob Zecca, his email is bob@teamdi.com. He's super responsive and easy to work with.

I didn't have my Nittos professionally heat cycled, but I put them on a few days ahead of time and cruised on the freeway for a little while. Stock brakes. My pads have 8k miles in them now and they're still in good shape.
 
#7 ·
nice write up.


now, we may need to open a separate thread to discuss the term "heat cycle" and to have some technical discussion regarding the finite heat cycles a tire can take before performance degradation occurs. In all my years of club and pro racing cars and motorcycles I have never heard of having my tires pre-heat cycled...short of a blow torch?


the chipbox mod sounds like the direction I will go. It will be a good mod at a good price.


regarding holding shifts longer...I suspect the rev limit may have been increased as is often the case. a few more hundred rpm's in top gear may put your qv in the legit 200 mph range...cool stuff!!!!


please keep us updated on the mods as it will go a long way to chronicle real life performance and reliability!!!


best,


pcb
 
#17 ·
$850 seems like cheap money for 65 extra HP......... well done.....

Keep us posted and maybe post some track videos......

who knows I may try to negotiate a group buy for other QV owners..........
 
  • Like
Reactions: wingler
#18 ·
I'd be interested in a group buy. Considering this or the EC, but with the clone option being $4K, $850 is more palatable. If the EC option were $2K then it'd be a closer decision based on the benefits of the EC being a full tune. But the fact that you're pretty much locked into the clone version to avoid warranty issues, it's a non-starter.
 
#19 ·
I'm still having tons of fun with the Seletron units. No issues to report at all. I have my first service appointment scheduled next week, so I'm going to remove the Chipboxes for a few days. I'm interested to feel the difference once it's back to stock.
 
#24 ·
The problem with the QV is the engine’s control system was developed for a car worth 4-5x’s more. Doubling up on the ECU’s for Ferrari isn’t much of a problem because a few thousand $ increase in cost isn’t much of a factor. Any tune or ECU upgrade is just way more expensive and complicated.
 
#38 ·
I only found out recently my QV had it installed when I bought it... Is what you may get when you buy one "as is...".
Im no expert and since I didn't install it it took me about 45 minutes to get it out. Especially rail on the passenger side is a real pain.
I'm glad I took it out, car is much more civil now and you can still catch it... It used to be very edgy of the line in race with the rear coming loose really easy.

Anywho... after reading into it i can't get over the idea that you're constantly tricking the system, even if some boxes trick really good... It may be TUV certified but isn't that just for the materials used? I don't believe you get a certificate for tricking the ECU successfully without compromise to wear and safety.
 
#39 ·
I only found out recently my QV had it installed when I bought it... Is what you may get when you buy one "as is...".
Im no expert and since I didn't install it it took me about 45 minutes to get it out. Especially rail on the passenger side is a real pain.
I'm glad I took it out, car is much more civil now and you can still catch it... It used to be very edgy of the line in race with the rear coming loose really easy.

Anywho... after reading into it i can't get over the idea that you're constantly tricking the system, even if some boxes trick really good... It may be TUV certified but isn't that just for the materials used? I don't believe you get a certificate for tricking the ECU successfully without compromise to wear and safety.
Funny you say that, because I've since decided the Seletron wasn't crazy enough. I now have a Madness Maxpower installed, and it's even more fun. I don't want my QV to be civil, what's the fun in that? When you're leaning into it and those turbos spool up and throw you back... Whooo buddy. Inject that into my veins.
 
#44 ·
Yes. Not what I am stating. I think you are misunderstanding me. What I am stating is the chipboxes could easily put out more power but Seletron makes sure to keep it in a safe range. Yes FCA is still figuring out things, but this is nothing new for any car manufacturer. Some Seletron boxes have been on cars already at 30K and more. From memory Seletron does have a Quad that they have done the testing on. Any modification, any, can put things a risk. If you are going to might as well go with something that does not push the parameters to the max.

View attachment 94421
All good, I get what you're saying and at the end of the day car owners should do whatever they want and weigh the risks as best they can.
And I bet these engines are factory tuned very conservative so there's room to play.