Alfa Romeo Giulia Forum banner

Flac

12K views 20 replies 15 participants last post by  buzzi  
#1 ·
Manual says FLAC is supported, has anyone tried?
 
#5 ·
Converting to FLAC files will reproduce the source information without degradation. It will not, however, make anything sound better. Converting a poor recording to FLAC does nothing for the quality of the recording. If you purchase HD music though, it is appropriate to save it as a lossless file (FLAC or otherwise) to preserve the integrity of the recording.
 
#14 ·
The other advantage of FLAC besides being lossless and occupying about half the file size, is that it handles metadata robust and consistent manner that works in most playback systems. WAV is also lossless but doesn't have consistent metadata and doesn't compress the file size.
Does it matter to have lossless and even High Res audio in a car? Our brain is very good at filling in the missing information of a lossy compressed file like MP3 and AAC which is why it can seem like a fairly subtle difference in sound quality. The problem is that your brain is working hard and you get tired - audiophiles call it 'listener fatigue'. It is more relaxing and engaging to listen to the higher quality recordings.
There is a new format coming - called MQA - that is about the same files size as a FLAC 16/44 CD file, but it 'unfolds' up to 24/192 and includes other features like removal of time smearing caused by digital filters used in the recording process. I don't think any car systems have it yet, but high end audio products are available with the decoder. All the major music labels have signed on and all the streaming services are lined up to support it. Thankfully, it is backward compatible so it can play on any system at 16/44 CD quality. Tidal is already offering it as 'Masters' available with a Hi-Fi level subscription.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Racer Z
#18 ·
I consider myself an audiophile of sorts I would safely say and I have placed all of my music library on 64 or 32 GB flash drives and they are mostly in FLAC or WAV format. Does anyone have any experience in the WAV format? I converted about 70% in WAV before I realized the FLAC would take up a little less space. I suppose anything that would play FLAC would play WAV but maybe not. If it plays only one or the other or neither I am going to have an issue with that.


Has anyone given this method a whirl with either or both of these file formats? The HK system is O.K. but it lacks.
Havent had the chance to try it with something other than the radio which usually doesnt impress me anyway.
Thanks,


Daniel
 
#21 ·
I didn't do FLAC but did WMA-Lossless. Lossless does sound better than mp3.

Used Windows Media Player (set up to auto-rip, making it relatively easy to do)
Originally ripped 50 CD's, first in MP3 (max sample rate)
Re-ripped the same 50 CD's in WMA-Lossless (after I bought the car) - Size - about 20gb

Put MP3s on one USB drive, WMA-L on another USB drive
Both plugged into glove box USB slots.

Easy to compare by switching between the two.

Have the HK system.

That all said, even though the lossless format sounds better and that's my default pick, I also have older mp3 files and listen to them without disappointment, but if you have a choice, rip lossless. If you don't know what a "CD" is....never mind.