Alfa Romeo Giulia Forum banner
561 - 580 of 1,144 Posts
Discussion starter · #564 ·
Something strange‘s going on. There’s no Giulia 2.0TB 280 hp RWD in Europe doing 1/4 mile faster than this 330i. Same with 100-200 km/h.
Lol sure there is. The 330i is in perfect weather. You just have to find giulia running in the same weather and it is faster.
 
Discussion starter · #566 ·
Stock EU Veloce Q4
0-100 km/h 5.5s
100-200 km/h 16.7s
VBox measurements
You cannot compare random samples on the internet. The bmw ran in 7 degree c air. Density altitude can impact times by 1mph and 1 tenth of a second in quarter mile for every 1200 feet difference or so. A car at 6000 feet will run .5 tenths and 5mph slower than that same car at sea level
 
You cannot compare random samples on the internet. The bmw ran in 7 degree c air. Density altitude can impact times by 1mph and 1 tenth of a second in quarter mile for every 1200 feet difference or so. A car at 6000 feet will run .5 tenths and 5mph slower than that same car at sea level
That seems to be pretty standard 100-200 kmh time here for the Q4 AWD .
Also only from 2020 it was possible to buy the RWD with 280 hp engine here. Earlier the RWD was 200 hp only.
 
You cannot compare random samples on the internet. The bmw ran in 7 degree c air. Density altitude can impact times by 1mph and 1 tenth of a second in quarter mile for every 1200 feet difference or so. A car at 6000 feet will run .5 tenths and 5mph slower than that same car at sea level
surprises me a lot of car guys run the car with a timing device and refuse to acknowledge the effects of temps and DA. It’s huge.
 
Discussion starter · #569 ·
That seems to be pretty standard 100-200 kmh time here for the Q4 AWD .
Also only from 2020 it was possible to buy the RWD with 280 hp engine here. Earlier the RWD was 200 hp only.
There really isnt a "standard" time for a country. The same car will be faster in the winter vs summer. At sea level vs in the mountains.

That bmw was in 7c air. Thats a perfect density altitude.
 
Been running without JB4 because throwing codes and ran a few runs tonight in rain. Was doing manual shifting. Also added in the 40-100 custom mode.
40-100 mph seems to be a better daily measurement for power. Not very often it’s possible doing 1/4 mile or 0-130 mph runs on public roads.
Most 2.0 Tb seems to be doing 40-100 mph in a 9.1s - 10.5s range, indicating not a huge difference in power going from stock to tuned.
@kozak is @ 7.61s and clearly shows a difference. The gap from 7.61s to 9.1is quite significant - maybe some 30hp?

Rough estimate for 2.0Tb? (weight, temp, fuel, DA)
7.61s = 350 chp (kozak dynoed)
8.00s = 340 chp
8.50s = 330 chp
9.00s = 320 chp
9.50s = 310 chp
10.0s = 300 chp (my car)
10.5s = 290 chp
11.0s = 280 chp (from automobilecatalog.com)

Maybe in real life not as linear results, so don’t take those estimates too serious..
 
561 - 580 of 1,144 Posts
Top