I have, but would be looking for shocks only, feel like ride height and spring rate is fine but damping could be a little firmer, would also consider stiffer anti roll bars but stock springs are good in my opinion.
Pretty sure the highest setting on those is still quite a bit lower than stock and also spring rate will be matched to a lower setting, ie. on the firm side, ideally i would retain stock springs but get firmer dampers and possibly firmer anti-roll bars as suggested by lowflyer.What you could do is put in a set of adjustable coilovers. Then set the ride height to factory and adjust the rest to suit.
![]()
https://madnessautoworks.com/2018-A...fa-romeo-giulia-coilover-kit-by-kw-v3-pid7786
Will look into that although i think stiffer anti-roll bars also warrant firmer shocks as otherwise the car might become a bit bouncy in for example S-curves?^^ have you looked into compatibility of swaybars between QV and 2.0T? On S4 we used to mount RS4 swaybars, some even put them on A4s...perfect fit and flat ride in corners....I am pretty sure QVs must be quite a bit chunkier
I don't think it's an issue traction wise, but less body roll will make the car more stable in quick transitions, so the car needs less time to recover after a curve by transferring less weight left and right every time. This is more desirable on a track than regular street use.It is not obvious to me that body roll is a bad thing if the suspension geometry was designed for it in the first place. It seems better to me to have compliant suspension so that the tires can keep good ground contact on uneven surfaces. Please explain what might be wrong with this reasoning.